Blogs

IN THE NEWS
THE BRAND LAWYER
MEDIATED REALITY

  • Who We Are
  • How We Work
  • What We Do
  • News
    • In The News
    • The Brand Lawyer
    • Mediated Reality
  • Contact Us
  • 310.457.6100

THE “DANCING BABY” WINS ITS CASE

  • Posted by Holmes Weinberg, PC
  • On September 16, 2015
  • In Content Clearance, Fair Use, The Brand Lawyer, Uncategorized

Copyright owners and online media services have been at odds about the responsibility (or lack of responsibility) the services like YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and others have when people post/upload without permission copyrighted content owned by the copyright owners. The compromise (developed earlier for earlier online publishers, like AOL, MySpace, and the like and made part of the Copyright Act with the 1998 amendments known as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (the “DMCA”)) is a procedure under which copyright owners can send takedown notices to the services identifying the copyrighted work and demanding that the offending content be taken off the site, and then the posting party is given an opportunity to respond. In what has become known as the “dancing baby” case, a mom in Pennsylvania who posted a video of her toddler dancing to the music of Prince’s “Let’s Go Crazy” in 2007 was sued by Universal Music for copyright infringement. The Electronic Frontier Foundation represented the mom (Stephanie Lenz) who obviously was not in the position to do battle on her own against Universal and the Recording Industry of America and the Motion Picture Association of America, which supported Universal. Ms. Lenz’ position was that the use of the song was “fair use” and thus not subject to liability. On Monday this week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that copyright owners under the DMCA must consider fair use before asking services like YouTube to remove videos posted to the site. The three-judge panel made it clear that paying “lip service” to fair use could expose a copyright owner to liability. However, the Court also stated that in making the fair use analysis, the copyright holder in moving forward with a takedown notice “need only form a subjective good faith belief that the use is not authorized.” According to the Court in making sure it was getting its message across is that “To be clear, if a copyright holder ignores or neglects our unequivocal holding that it must consider fair use before sending a takedown notification, it is liable for damages under § 512(f). If, however, a copyright holder forms a subjective good faith belief the allegedly infringing material does not constitute fair use, we are in no position to dispute the copyright holder’s belief even if we would have reached the opposite conclusion. A copyright holder who pays lip service to the consideration of fair use by claiming it formed a good faith belief when there is evidence to the contrary is still subject to § 512(f) liability.” The Court added that “a copyright holder’s consideration of fair use need not be searching or intensive…formation of a subjective good faith belief does not require investigation of the allegedly infringing content,” but added that a copyright owner who acts with “willful blindness” with respect to fair use, that is it “subjectively believes” there is a “high probability” that the posted content constituted fair use and “took deliberate actions to avoid learning of this fair use,” likely will face liability if it sends a takedown notice.

Given the state of the fair use doctrine, which is somewhat in disarray, this should get really interesting.

A copy of the opinion is at http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/09/14/13-16106.pdf.

Posted

Share:

Previous Post

UP PERISCOPE!

Next Post

THE MEAT MEET MARKET
Latest Posts
  • Introduction to GDPR, Europe’s sweeping new data protection legislationMarch 21, 2018
  • Has the Advent of Mediated Reality Changed Intellectual Property Law?March 5, 2018
  • The Check Box: The Growing Need for Auto-Renewal Second ConsentFebruary 20, 2018
  • Help, My Trademark is Being Audited!February 19, 2018
  • DON’T SLEEP ON LBE RIGHTS!February 5, 2018
Categories
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Brand Expansion
  • Brand Innovation
  • Brand Licensing
  • Brand Mistakes
  • Brand Popularity
  • Brands Generally
  • Content Clearance
  • Demographics
  • Digital Advertising
  • Digital Marketing
  • Domain Names
  • Facebook and Brands
  • Fair Use
  • False Advertising
  • Intellectual Property
  • Leading brands
  • Mediated Reality
  • News
  • Press
  • Social media platforms
  • Super Bowl Marketing
  • The Brand Lawyer
  • Trademark Protection
  • Twitter and Brands
  • Uncategorized
Tags
Band Legal IssuesBrandBrand and Social MediaBrand and TrademarksBrand Challengesbrand communicationBrand Expansionbrandingbranding and sociBranding and Social Mediabranding businessBranding LawBrand InnovationBrand Legal issueBrand Legal IssuesBrand LicensingBrandsbrands and fansbrands and social mediaBrands and trademarksbrands and twitterbrand social media platformsconsumersContent ClearanceInfringementIntellectual Propertymillennial and brandsmillennial consumingmillennialsMillennials and brandssocial mediasocial media fanstrademarks
Advertise
Scroll

Holmes Weinberg is a power-house boutique law firm founded in 2008 by veteran lawyers Henry Holmes and Steven Weinberg.
info@holmesweinberg.com
+ 310. 457. 6100

30765 Pacific Coast Hwy
Malibu, CA 90265
United States

100 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 1300A
Santa Monica CA 90401
(424) 272-5081

444 S. Flower Street
Suite 1850A
Los Angeles 90071
(213) 761-7442

What We Do
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Litigation
  • Advertising and Marketing
  • Entertainment Law
  • Digital Media
  • Business Law and General Counseling
  • Licensing and Sponsorship
  • Mediated Reality
Latest Posts
  • Introduction to GDPR, Europe’s sweeping new data protection legislation
  • Has the Advent of Mediated Reality Changed Intellectual Property Law?
  • The Check Box: The Growing Need for Auto-Renewal Second Consent
  • Help, My Trademark is Being Audited!
  • DON’T SLEEP ON LBE RIGHTS!
@ Copyright 2017 | Powered by: Matador Solutions
MENU
  • Who We Are
  • How We Work
  • What We Do
  • News
    • In The News
    • The Brand Lawyer
    • Mediated Reality
  • Contact Us
  • 310.457.6100